Alternative
A NoFilterGPT alternative that keeps nothing
NoFilterGPT is an uncensored general assistant with a Pro plan at $11.99 a month, a no-logging claim that has not been independently audited, and a facial-recognition people-finder bundled in. nokeep is the alternative for people who want the same absence of filter without an account, a subscription, or a server that keeps anything.
Updated
NoFilterGPT does what its name says. Reviews from July 2026 describe a general assistant that answers medical, legal, fiction and adult prompts that mainstream chatbots deflect, wrapped in a familiar chat interface. The free tier allows roughly five to seven messages a day. Pro costs $11.99 a month, or $9.99 a month on a yearly plan, and unlocks image generation, image-to-video, face swap, voice and an API key. It takes card or crypto.
That is a real product with a real feature list, and if you want voice or an API in one uncensored bundle it offers things nokeep does not. This page is about the two questions a careful buyer should ask before paying, and about the narrower thing nokeep is built to do.
Two things to weigh before you pay
The first is the privacy claim. NoFilterGPT says it encrypts conversations and does not log them. It may be true. But as of July 2026 there is no independent audit, no published architecture, and no way for a customer to check. A claim you cannot verify is a claim you are asked to believe, and the whole point of choosing a private assistant is not having to.
Encryption in particular is the word to be careful with. Encrypting a conversation in transit is what every website does. Encrypting it at rest on a server the company controls means the company can still read it, produce it, or lose it. Neither is the same as not keeping it, and a marketing page that says AES without saying who holds the key is describing the lock, not who has a copy of it.
The second is the people-finder. The same product bundles a facial-recognition tool that finds a person from a photograph. Reviewers flagged it as a privacy concern, and they were right to. A company that sells a way to identify strangers from their faces is making a statement about how it thinks about other people’s privacy, and that statement sits in the same account as your conversations.
A smaller point: the pricing page uses countdown-timer discounts. That is a sales technique, not a defect, but it is worth noticing that the price on the day you look is designed to feel like it is about to rise.
How is nokeep different from NoFilterGPT?
nokeep does not ask you to believe a retention policy, because there is nothing to retain. Your conversation passes through our server in memory to reach the model and is never written down there. The only copy is the one in your own browser, where you can erase it with one action. There is no recent-chats list on our side to leak, subpoena or breach.
There is no account. Not an optional one and not a lightweight one. You open nokeep.ai and type. Paying returns a claim key rather than a profile, and the card statement descriptor is discreet. Card and crypto both work.
There is no subscription unless you want one. Credits start at $3, which is about 30 images or 4 five-second clips, and they never expire. Chat is free every day: 10 messages, 2 images and a clip a day while the day’s free clips last, which is larger than NoFilterGPT’s free tier of five to seven messages. Plans from $15 a month exist for heavy image and video users, and they cancel any time.
There is no people-finder, and there will not be one. nokeep answers the prompts mainstream assistants refuse, but the legal limits are firm: adults only, nothing involving minors, and nothing non-consensual involving real people.
Uncensored on both, with different edges
Both products will answer the prompts that make ChatGPT and Gemini change the subject: a frank medical question, a legal problem described in the first person, fiction with adult themes, roleplay that is supposed to stay in character. Neither adds a moderation layer of its own on top of the model, and on that axis they are closer to each other than either is to a mainstream assistant.
The edges differ in what surrounds the chat. NoFilterGPT surrounds it with a media suite: images, image-to-video, face swap and voice, sold as one Pro bundle. nokeep surrounds it with less, and with a rule. Images and five-second clips follow the same no-filter policy as the text, with aspect ratios from square to vertical, and everything you make sits in a gallery on your device. Face swap is not offered because most of what it is used for involves a real person who did not agree.
Roleplay is worth a specific word, because it is where filters usually leak. On nokeep the model stays in character rather than stepping out to lecture, and standing instructions let you set a persona or a tone once so that every conversation starts from it. That is not a character library, and it is not sold as one, but it is the part of the roleplay experience that a filter usually breaks.
What does NoFilterGPT have that nokeep does not?
Voice. NoFilterGPT Pro includes a voice mode; nokeep is text, images and video only.
An API key. If you want to build on top of an uncensored model, NoFilterGPT sells that; nokeep does not offer an API.
Face swap and image-to-video as named tools. nokeep generates images from prompts, edits from reference images and renders five-second clips, but it does not ship a face-swap feature, and its policy on real people rules out most of what face swap is used for.
A single bundle at a single monthly price. Some people prefer that to credits, and for them the subscription is the simpler shape.
Which to choose
Choose NoFilterGPT if you want voice, an API, or face swap in one subscription, and you are comfortable taking the no-logging claim on trust.
Choose nokeep if the reason you searched for an uncensored assistant was that you did not want a record to exist. No account, nothing stored on the server, a no-retention agreement on every engine, and $3 to start instead of $11.99 a month. It is not the most private thing available, since a model on your own machine is, but it is the most private hosted option that still answers like a frontier model and makes images and video from the same composer.
| NoFilterGPT | nokeep | |
|---|---|---|
| Account required | Yes | No |
| Free tier | About 5–7 messages a day (Jul 2026) | 10 messages, 2 images and a clip a day |
| Price | Pro $11.99/month, or $9.99/month yearly | Credits from $3, nothing renews; plans from $15 optional |
| Where chats live | Their servers; no logging claimed, not audited | Your browser only, never on our servers |
| Images and video | On Pro, with image-to-video and face swap | Images and 5-second clips from the composer |
| Voice and API | On Pro | No |
| Facial-recognition people-finder | Bundled | None |
| Payment | Card or crypto | Card or crypto; returns a claim key, not an identity |
Asked before you asked
Is NoFilterGPT private?
It says so. As of July 2026 it claims encrypted, unlogged conversations, but there is no independent audit and no published way to check. Treat it as a promise rather than a property. The bundled facial-recognition people-finder is a separate reason reviewers raised privacy concerns about the company itself.
How much does NoFilterGPT cost?
Reviews from July 2026 put Pro at $11.99 a month, or $9.99 a month paid yearly, with images, image-to-video, face swap, voice and an API key. The free tier allows about five to seven messages a day. Discounts are shown with countdown timers, so the displayed price moves.
What does nokeep not do that NoFilterGPT does?
Voice, an API key and a face-swap tool. nokeep is chat, images and five-second video from one composer, with a web search toggle and standing instructions. If voice or an API is the point, NoFilterGPT is the one that has it.
Is nokeep cheaper than NoFilterGPT?
For most people, yes. The free tier is larger, and credits start at $3 with nothing renewing, so an occasional user never pays a monthly fee. A heavy image or video user can take a plan from $15 a month, which is more than NoFilterGPT Pro but includes 200 images or 66 clips and unmetered chat.
Why does a people-finder matter if I never use it?
Because it tells you what the company is willing to build. A tool that identifies strangers from a photo is the opposite of a privacy product, and it lives under the same roof as your conversations. nokeep has no such tool and its policy forbids non-consensual content involving real people.