Pick a lane, or just buy credits.
Every plan covers everything: chat, code, images, video, web search.
The models are open-weight and already trained, running on rented capacity. We aren’t building data centres or draining a town’s water to train the next frontier model, so you aren’t paying off one.
Your money knows who you are. We don’t.
The payment and the conversation never meet
You pay the processor and they hand back a token. The reference tying the two together is sealed with a key that is not kept in the database, so a copy of our data resolves to nothing. Being straight about the limit: the running server holds that key, so we could be compelled to ask the processor who paid. What nobody can produce is what you asked — the conversation was never written down, so there is no transcript to attach a name to.
The ones worth asking first.
Including the ones where the honest answer is a limit rather than a promise.
Be precise about what they give away, because it is a lot and it is good. Duck.ai anonymises you to the model, keeps recent chats on your device rather than their servers, and does not train on prompts — that is a real privacy product, and on anonymity it does something we do not claim to beat. What it cannot change is the model itself. Your message still goes to Claude, Llama or GPT, so the refusal arrives with the weights: it was trained in, and no amount of anonymity in front of it alters what comes back. Removing it would mean hosting open models and answering for what they say, which is not a trade a browser company makes. So the difference is not privacy. It is whether you get an answer.
Still unsure · the free tier needs no card